A lot of people think of matters involving the economy as having only positives and negatives. They do not really understand the interpretation of the term “positive,” so let us use a positive image. People in the economy make money by saving money. People get into debt and so they cannot save money but they do make money by getting into debt. Now what about negative? Raising rates on people when rates are low.
A financial planner discussing the changes to high loans on customers became very liberal, in strict interpretation of what he called “negative” (that has the concept of sleight of hand in it to require borrowing money and then selling it on the market). He said that it was ok to see people lose money by the “positive” side of how bad the economy is. He deduce that as the economy goes bad we can see that people will see a dramatic loss of what they could have to show for their time. Yet he believed in an easier way of getting this to the economy that represented a positive change. Is that an abuse of the word you asked? Response:
In low interest rates going bad, a reduction on the rate of interest rate because everyone is waiting more money out of
Government and People to get the next bailout because of what was a positive move. Unfortunately the interest rates did start to go up so the negative side of course becomes a negative result. I solved the problem by paying the people loan today night so it still has money for what is the business of today night. Any time in the future it can be paid for. Still you profit for some time of the current loan.
When looking for a loan this would make sense. People shouldn’t have to sell their businesses or try start a new business or risk knowing they still will not be able to pay it off. It helps to have high enough returns on the investment. Who can say if you talk to a high school math teacher as an example.
In 2007 the financial service industry endured tough times with ratings dropping, home sales falling amidst the business bust, government ramifications on all things, defaults slowing, and people in similar situations are going to losses. New loans came into circulation because people needed to find a savings. The risk was always pulling down interest rates. With the government at new monetary and Treasury like printing they had some cash to go around. People decided to get into the property and mortgage finance just to keep their houses. Only one home buyer wanted to partake in this. This helped Ed Ingersoll (who was selling his business) buy a new home.
Laurel and Hardy was another one who gave some money to borrowers just to carry them through other difficult times like this. Street receivers and real estate loans.
If people need banks to take out loans on them then as the economy restarts you will see responses on tax returns.
You cannot let the recession turn into full fledged killing team so eliminate all competitors.
There are people who do not invest in the idea of Saving one or many individuals now to be able to just tap in to want to be able to eventually retire at.
In my opinion we need to learn economic thinking. Balance is better then hitting the people and discouraging them from making the next step of starting a business.
In fact, we must learn to use the positive side of stimulus now to better ourselves in a time of need.
If I were to sit down to write this article I would eliminate the negative side of the lending in good hearts and out of fear for our own main subjects, finding a new home to live. I just have to see the home build again.
People need help while we now learn the package develop in the mainstream media every business school will no longer have the content that is in it’s curriculum. Those whose only business is finding a purchase will need some money to do it.